That would put him at about 7,500 posts, well behind schedule. Not that the numbers themselves really matter of course, as I'd find it extremely hard to believe that such action would be taken for that reason.

But you dont know is the question do we?

If Erhama had actually carried through with spamming enough to reach 10,000 posts, which he didn't, I probably would have tried to get the mods to agree to clean out some unimportant threads that he spammed, but I never would have deleted a thread without discussing it first.

Plus, the AAC was the thread that made coming to this forum every day and posting possible for me. For a long time I never came here because it was DEAD, but with the AAC thread I find that I have more interaction with other members and I have a reason again to enjoy posting here. I would never delete a thread that meant so much to me.

just like when one of mine got deleted i got mad and they think it was me that did it ;(

I think the only reason you're suspected is because you brought up that rule a few pages ago.

to "justify" a reason why you would delete threads? uh I remember back then they think it was ME

It was just bad timing, boines XD

From what I'm hearing, you're implying that it's me. If you are, I give you permission to post it here, pm's and all. Please include the date of this pm where you're asked if it's ok. I'd like to see when I sent you this. My memory is a bit hazy.

But he was spamming.. he was actually trying to get to first place. he said it out of his own mouth. How the heck does he go from 5,000+ post to 7,000+ in only 6 days. thats alot of spam.

EnVy, how is that spam?

I don't disagree with you EnVy, but it doesn't justify deleting those topics.

Has nærd been made the only moderator of the Fun and Gmaes section for security reasons, then?

Maybe the culprit has been discovered and everybody else has resigned in protest.

Not that I don't fully trust naerd's ability, if its for security then Bonky may be better.

Snooty's removed most mods' powers from F&G for security, yes. The reason nærd has been left off is because she wasn't a moderator in that section the first time this happened, which - assuming it's just one person behind both incidents - rules her out.

Oh, that's clever.

How long for?

(Also, has anyone else got that undying urge to create an identity parade? No?)

Hmmm, have you seen The Usual Suspects? Perhaps the real villain is right under our noses all along...

He's our mouths!?

Sssh, don't tell them why! I'm doing the most trustworthy moderator angle, I think they're buying it!